Deep multi-agent critique pipeline that finds logical gaps, unsupported claims, missing edge cases, and internal contradictions in any document — then fixes them. Two independent critics review the document cold (seeing nothing about how it was made) to catch problems the author is blind to. Sweet spot is outcome-focused plans (WHAT+WHY); the doctrine guard and mid-loop drift-into-how detection keep HOW-creep out across the loop. Use when the user wants to review, critique, stress-test, or improve a PRD, SPEC, design doc, outcome plan, RFC, or any important document before it ships. Also use when the user says "critique this", "review this document", "find problems in", "…
