Simulates an academic council of six figures (Skeptic/Reviewer 2, Optimist/Reviewer 1, publication-driven PI, Outsider from another field, Methodologist/Statistician, Grant Panel) who each evaluate a section of the user's research from a distinct lens, then returns the six opinions, a summary table, the points requiring careful attention, the points that are solid, and an overall assessment with the best course of action.
