Plan and write an academic rebuttal in two stages. Stage 1 triages the reviews, split them into atomic concerns, diagnose the doubt behind each, rate severity and decision impact, and produce a prioritized P0-P3 experiment plan. Stage 2 drafts the rebuttal from completed results using Direct Answer -> Evidence -> Revision. Use when reviews arrive, when deciding whether a rebuttal is worth the author's time, when ranking rebuttal experiments, or when drafting or quality-checking the response. Never fabricates results, reviewer intent, or manuscript locations.
